Submittal: Submittal Rfi Turnaround Table
The Submittal Rfi Turnaround Table carries 6 published figures read from 4 sources' own pages, from 7 to 30 day, read 11 September 2026.
Jobcardo sells its own paid plan in this category (our pricing). It is not counted here: every figure in this index is another provider's own published price, read from its own page.
4 of the 35 named sources read in full publish a figure; 31 publish none, read 11 September 2026.
Every figure, with its source
One row per source: the figure the source's own page publishes, the page, and the day it was read. A figure that is not on a page we read is not on this one.
| Source | Figure | Read |
|---|---|---|
| City of Parker, Texas Code of Ordinances 155.031 As-Built Plat Plan; Record Drawings | 30day | 2026-09-11 |
| Transport for NSW - Works Authorisation Deed (private development) | 20day | 2026-09-11 |
| CSI - Shop Drawings and Submittals: Timeliness of Submittal Reviews | 14day | 2026-09-11 |
| Law Insider - submittal review clause library | 14day | 2026-09-11 |
| Law Insider - submittal review clause library | 14day | 2026-09-11 |
| Law Insider - submittal review clause library | 7day | 2026-09-11 |
The sentence each figure was read from (6)
- City of Parker, Texas Code of Ordinances 155.031 As-Built Plat Plan; Record Drawings, read 2026-09-11:
As-built plat plans shall be required to be submitted to the city within 30 days after all public improvements and utilities have been installed, inspected by appropriate authorities, and approved.
- Transport for NSW - Works Authorisation Deed (private development), read 2026-09-11:
Provided the works are satisfactory and meet Transport's standards, Transport will issue a Practical Completion certificate along with a list of defects and/or omissions and request submission of the ‘Works as Executed’ drawings within 20 days.
- CSI - Shop Drawings and Submittals: Timeliness of Submittal Reviews, read 2026-09-11:
Allow not less than 14 days for Engineer’s review, starting on Engineer’s actual receipt of each Submittal.
- Law Insider - submittal review clause library, read 2026-09-11:
7.10.1 The A/E shall review Submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data, and Samples for conformity with design intent and conformity with the Contract Documents within 14 days of receiving Submittals or in accordance with the approved submittal schedule, or other period as mutually agreed by the A/E and Contractor.
- Law Insider - submittal review clause library, read 2026-09-11:
7.10.3 The A/E shall act upon resubmission of corrected Submittals within 14 days of receiving them, or other period as mutually agreed by the A/E and Contractor.
- Law Insider - submittal review clause library, read 2026-09-11:
The A/E shall issue a written notice to the Contractor stating that its Submittal is being held, within 7 days of receiving it.
Read in full, publishes no figure
31 named sources were read in full on the dates shown and print no usable figure. They are counted, never filled in.
- FAR 52.236-21 Specifications and Drawings for Construction, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- eCFR 48 CFR 52.236-21, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- FAR 36.521 Specifications and drawings for construction (prescription), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- GSAM 552.236-21 Specifications and Drawings for Construction (GSA), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- GSAM 552.236-72 (GSA construction clause), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- VAAR 852.236-71 Specifications and Drawings for Construction (VA), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- UFGS 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures (DoD, WBDG), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- UFGS 01 78 00 Closeout Submittals (DoD, WBDG), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- FHWA Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide, ch.4, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- FHWA Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide, ch.4 (cont.), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- FHWA Current Design-Build Practices, ch.6 Project Management, read 2026-09-11: every candidate on the page was refused
- FHWA Development and Review of Specifications (attachment 2), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- TxDOT Shop Drawing Submittal Cycle, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- LA City Bureau of Engineering, Project Delivery Manual 16.1 Shop Drawings, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- LA City Bureau of Engineering, Project Delivery Manual 25.2 Record Drawings & As-Built Plans, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- California DGS Division of the State Architect - start a construction project by submitting plans, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction (manual page), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- INDOT Standards and Specifications, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- Wright State University - Design Review Process and Expectations, read 2026-09-11: every candidate on the page was refused
- Rutgers University Design Standards, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- Manual of Contract Documents for Highway Works, Series 0100 Preliminaries (National Highways, GB), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- NSW Government construction procurement guide - contract management, read 2026-09-11: every candidate on the page was refused
- MTO Technical Consultation Portal - amendment to OPSS.PROV 100 General Conditions, read 2026-09-11: every candidate on the page was refused
- PSPC - federal framework for prompt payment and adjudication in construction, read 2026-09-11: every candidate on the page was refused
- ASCE Policy Statement 290 - post-construction drawings of civil engineering projects, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- ConstructionClaims - what is a reasonable time for review of submittals, read 2026-09-11: every candidate on the page was refused
- Cohen Seglias - review of submittals (government contracting database), read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
- Procore library - construction submittals, read 2026-09-11: every candidate on the page was refused
- Procore library - RFIs in construction, read 2026-09-11: every candidate on the page was refused
- eSUB - the RFI and its cost to your construction firm, read 2026-09-11: every candidate on the page was refused
- Fieldwire - shop drawings in construction, read 2026-09-11: read in full and no accepted figure on the page
Methodology
Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).
4 of the 35 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 31 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 2 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.
The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in day (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 72 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.
The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): Across every public owner and standard contract form whose own text we can read: the stated period for acting on a shop-drawing or product-data submittal, for a resubmittal, for answering an RFI, and for delivering record drawings after substantial completion - normalised from calendar, business and working days onto one scale - with the median and the spread per jurisdiction and per owner type, and the SHARE that state no period at all and fall back on 'reasonable promptness'.
Nobody publishes that share; it is the number a project engineer actually needs when a reviewer has sat on a submittal for three weeks.
72 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.
Sources (37)
- FAR 52.236-21 Specifications and Drawings for Construction(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- eCFR 48 CFR 52.236-21(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- FAR 36.521 Specifications and drawings for construction (prescription)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- GSAM 552.236-21 Specifications and Drawings for Construction (GSA)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- GSAM 552.236-72 (GSA construction clause)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- VAAR 852.236-71 Specifications and Drawings for Construction (VA)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- UFGS 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures (DoD, WBDG)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- UFGS 01 78 00 Closeout Submittals (DoD, WBDG)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- FHWA Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide, ch.4(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- FHWA Construction Program Management and Inspection Guide, ch.4 (cont.)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- FHWA Current Design-Build Practices, ch.6 Project Management(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- FHWA Development and Review of Specifications (attachment 2)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- TxDOT Shop Drawing Submittal Cycle(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- LA City Bureau of Engineering, Project Delivery Manual 16.1 Shop Drawings(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- LA City Bureau of Engineering, Project Delivery Manual 25.2 Record Drawings & As-Built Plans(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- City of Parker, Texas Code of Ordinances 155.031 As-Built Plat Plan; Record Drawings(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- California DGS Division of the State Architect - start a construction project by submitting plans(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- WSDOT Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction (manual page)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- INDOT Standards and Specifications(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Wright State University - Design Review Process and Expectations(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Rutgers University Design Standards(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Manual of Contract Documents for Highway Works, Series 0100 Preliminaries (National Highways, GB)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Transport for NSW - Works Authorisation Deed (private development)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- NSW Government construction procurement guide - contract management(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- MTO Technical Consultation Portal - amendment to OPSS.PROV 100 General Conditions(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- PSPC - federal framework for prompt payment and adjudication in construction(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- CSI - Shop Drawings and Submittals: Timeliness of Submittal Reviews(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- ASCE Policy Statement 290 - post-construction drawings of civil engineering projects(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Law Insider - submittal review clause library(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- ConstructionClaims - what is a reasonable time for review of submittals(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Cohen Seglias - review of submittals (government contracting database)(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Procore library - construction submittals(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Procore library - RFIs in construction(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- eSUB - the RFI and its cost to your construction firm(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- Fieldwire - shop drawings in construction(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- google.com(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
- fhwa.dot.gov(the publisher's own terms; quoted for reporting and comment)
Cite or embed this figure
Cite or embed this figure
The Submittal Rfi Turnaround Table carries 6 published figures read from 4 sources' own pages, from 7 to 30 day, read 11 September 2026.
4 of the 35 named sources read in full publish a figure; 31 publish none, read 11 September 2026.
Cite as: "Jobcardo Submittal Rfi Turnaround Table", updated 2026-10-18, https://jobcardo.com/datasets/submittal-rfi-turnaround-table/.
Download the CSV (6 rows, computed 2026-10-18)